Nicole Rafferty---Lone Tree, Colorado----720-840-7760-----nikki@raffertyhome.com-----nicolerafferty@alexandertechniquerafferty.com

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Google+ Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Pinterest Social Icon

© 2023 by Nicole Rafferty. Proudly created with Wix.com

February 28, 2018

March 28, 2017

March 1, 2017

Please reload

Recent Posts

Collapse is Part of Life

February 28, 2018

1/4
Please reload

Featured Posts

What makes a student "gifted?"

February 5, 2017

 

 

The issue with assuming a student is “gifted,” solely by virtue of their genetics, underestimates the individual’s choices and the influence of their education.  It also implies that unless an individual is born with a predisposition for an activity that the individual has little to no chance of developing the skill sets needed to be successful in that activity.

 

 

Suppose for an instance that we accept the proposition that “talent” is the product of skilled critical thinking processes and that those processes can be influenced by education and parenting. If this is true, any child could be deemed “talented” in whatever skill set they choose, if teachers and parents devote themselves to helping children learn critical thinking skills.

 

Some may argue that such a claim underestimates the power of genetics and I will concede that genetics may limit an individual’s abilities. However, as a society we still do not know enough about how genetics manifest in behavior to make claims about an individual’s potential. In this regard, limiting the prospective abilities of a child based on an adult’s interpretation of their inborn skill level, is at best reckless and at worst irresponsible. It then falls to the parent and teacher to not limit a child based on the adult’s biases but give them the best opportunities for success.

 

The question then becomes, what is the best way in which to help the child? Classic education over the last 100 years has tried to advance education by divorcing mind and body. John Dewey claims that this philosophy has led to the degradation of learning. As an Alexander Technique teacher, I would agree with Dewey. The separation of one’s mental activities from their physical is unproductive. The best thing we can do is develop the child’s mental dexterity by also developing the awareness of their physical being.

 

 

The term pyscho-physical re-education and neuromuscular re-education were adopted as brief explanations for the Alexander Technique because of the philosophical emphasis that the mind and body are not separate. In fact, many students of the Technique report that as their awareness of their physical state improves their thinking processes also develops in positive ways. If this phenomenon is true, then the best way we can help all students become “talented” is to encourage their education based on the principles of the Alexander Technique.

 

Please reload

Follow Us
Please reload

Search By Tags